Listen to the article
Stroke survivors often face long-term challenges with arm function, but new research suggests that training the less-affected arm can significantly improve daily living activities. According to a clinical trial conducted by researchers at Pennsylvania State University, focusing rehabilitation efforts on the so-called “good” arm may help stroke survivors perform everyday tasks faster and more efficiently, even years after their initial stroke.
The research team, led by Candice Meinza and Robert Sainberg from Penn State’s Translational Neurorehabilitation Center, found that both arms experience functional impairments following stroke. Compared to the dominant hand of a healthy person, stroke survivors may take three times longer to complete daily tasks using their less-affected arm, according to the study.
Understanding Stroke Impact on Both Arms
A stroke occurs when blood flow carrying oxygen to part of the brain is interrupted due to a blocked blood vessel or bleeding, resulting in brain cell death. Traditionally, rehabilitation programs have focused exclusively on restoring movement to the more severely affected arm, based on the understanding that each side of the brain controls the opposite side of the body.
However, recent research has revealed that both sides of the brain contribute to controlling movements in both arms. Damage to one side of the brain can affect both limbs, meaning the less-affected arm is not entirely normal and may suffer from reduced strength, slower movement, and impaired motor coordination.
Clinical Trial Results for Stroke Rehabilitation
In a clinical trial involving more than 50 people with chronic stroke and severe disabilities in one arm, participants were randomly divided into two groups. The first group trained the more affected arm, while the second group focused on training the less-affected arm, according to the researchers.
Both groups received five weeks of therapy that included difficult hand movements, realistic tasks, and virtual reality simulations designed to improve coordination and timing. The results showed that participants who trained their less-affected arm became faster and more efficient at performing daily tasks such as picking up small objects or lifting a cup.
Additionally, these improvements persisted for six months after the training concluded. The researchers attribute this lasting improvement to a feedback loop: as arm function improves, survivors use it more in daily life, which reinforces the training and helps solidify the gains.
Shifting Rehabilitation Focus
While stroke rehabilitation has long focused on the more affected arm, many survivors never fully regain its function and must rely on their less-affected arm. Nevertheless, this arm is not completely “healthy,” and any problems with it significantly impact a person’s independence and quality of life, the study indicates.
Improving the performance of the less-affected arm makes daily tasks faster, easier, and less exhausting, even years after the stroke. For many stroke survivors taking three times longer to complete basic activities, targeted training of their better arm offers a practical path to greater independence.
Meanwhile, stroke survivors who depend almost entirely on their less-affected arm for eating, dressing, and household chores face substantial challenges. The research demonstrates that addressing weaknesses in motor control, strength, and coordination in this arm can meaningfully reduce the burden of daily activities.
Future Directions in Stroke Recovery
In contrast to traditional approaches, the new findings suggest that recovery may not always mean restoring what was lost, but rather strengthening what remains. This paradigm shift in stroke rehabilitation could benefit thousands of survivors who have not responded to conventional therapy focused solely on their impaired limb.
Future research will focus on integrating less-affected arm training with standard treatment programs for the more affected arm, and exploring how these approaches can be applied in daily life at home. Researchers have not confirmed specific timelines for implementing these methods in clinical practice, but the promising results suggest broader application may be forthcoming.
