Listen to the article
A panel of university presidents convened in one of Abu Dhabi’s glass-and-marble conference spaces last January to discuss whether or not artificial intelligence should take the place of their faculty. The topic of discussion at the event, “Machines Can Think 2026,” was real. The president of Khalifa University, the provost of NYU Abu Dhabi, and the provost of Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence—all three institutions operating within the same policy environment—all come to remarkably different conclusions about what AI should actually do in a classroom. AI was already being used by Khalifa University to create course-specific tutoring agents that could provide personalized instruction around-the-clock. Teaching is repetitive, and repetitive tasks belong to machines, freeing up faculty for research, was the justification put forth. Some panelists weren’t so sure. By all accounts, the argument did not end amicably.
The UAE’s approach to AI in schools has been anything but clear, and this ambiguity at the university level is somewhat at odds with what’s happening further down the educational system. The new teaching framework for the 2026–2027 school year, which covers kindergarten through Grade 12 in both public and private schools using the national curriculum, was approved by the Ministry of Education in February 2026. A subtle but significant change was hidden among the specifics of new lesson plans and standardized schedules: the course formerly known as computing, creative design, and innovation has been formally renamed “Artificial Intelligence and Technology.” All educational levels will now teach the subject. AI will just be a part of the curriculum for a five-year-old in Abu Dhabi starting school the following year, just like math or Arabic.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Location | Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates |
| Key Policy | UAE National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2031 |
| Digital Strategy | Abu Dhabi Government Digital Strategy 2025–2027 |
| Budget Allocated | AED 13 billion to AI development |
| Curriculum Scope | Kindergarten through Grade 12 (all government schools) |
| New Subject Name | “Artificial Intelligence and Technology” (replacing Computing) |
| Academic Year of Implementation | 2025–2026 (curriculum), 2026–2027 (full teaching plan) |
| Key Education Company | EDNAS (UAE-based EdTech) |
| EDNAS Rollout Timeline | 2025: curriculum; 2026: teacher training; 2027: school accreditation |
| Key University | Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI) |
| Notable Conference | “Machines Can Think 2026,” Abu Dhabi |
| Reference Website | UAE Ministry of Education |
This goal has a very substantial infrastructure. AED 13 billion was set aside for AI development in the Abu Dhabi government’s Digital Strategy 2025–2027; in contrast, similar initiatives in Europe appear tentative. Compared to neighboring Saudi Arabia, which introduced a “Introduction to AI” course specifically for third-year high school students, the UAE has also made AI education mandatory for all students from kindergarten through Grade 12. The difference within the Gulf itself is instructive: while both nations are heading in the same direction, the UAE’s timeline is quicker and its scope is wider, bringing AI literacy down to the youngest students instead of making it an elective close to graduation.
The practical difficulty of realizing this vision has created its own ecosystem on the ground. In September 2025, EDNAS, an education technology company based in the United Arab Emirates, introduced what it claims is the nation’s first fully resourced AI literacy curriculum for schools, covering Years 1 through 9. The fact that the materials were created in collaboration with educators and AI specialists and benchmarked against global standards, such as PISA 2029, indicates that the design wasn’t just aspirational but rather prepared for the kind of assessment comparisons that cause anxiety in education ministries. The rollout is planned in three stages: curriculum materials will be delivered in 2025, teacher training accredited by CPD will take place in 2026, and school accreditation services will be provided in 2027. Recognizing that a curriculum that only functions in English is a curriculum with a ceiling, Arabic-language resources are being introduced starting in the second year.
The disparity between these plans’ aspirations and the more subdued realities of execution is difficult to ignore. The component of education reforms of this magnitude that typically lags behind is teacher training; this is not because governments ignore it, but rather because developing true pedagogical confidence with new technology takes more time than creating curriculum documents. The UAE acknowledged this clearly, as evidenced by the government’s announcement in October 2025 of a program designed to enhance teachers’ comprehension of AI and equip them with useful classroom skills rather than merely theoretical knowledge. Over the next two years, education researchers will probably keep a close eye on whether that training keeps up with the curriculum rollout.
An additional layer of context is provided by the larger regional picture. UNICEF estimates that 89 million school-age children in the MENA region do not have access to the internet at home. While many classrooms in Tunisia still use chalkboards, a digital education platform called “Tunis Future School” aims to reach 500 educational institutions. The push for AI education in the Gulf is taking place in an area where the infrastructure gap between GCC states and their neighbors is substantial and growing. Policy researchers believe that the Gulf’s investments are paving the way for a two-speed education future in the Middle East, where the skills gap between Saudi and Emirati students and those in less developed nations could widen significantly over the next ten years.
The governance issue that looms over all of this is more about data than infrastructure. Gathering data about students’ learning styles, performance trends, and levels of engagement is necessary when integrating AI into the classroom. When it comes to AI governance, GCC countries have typically adopted what scholars refer to as a “soft regulation” approach, placing more emphasis on national strategies and values than legally binding frameworks. The binding international standard, the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention on AI, has not been signed by any. Although the UAE has made significant strides in data protection legislation, it is still unclear, at least in the public record, how student data is handled in AI-powered educational tools.
The pace of the reform is unlikely to be slowed by any of this. The classroom rollout in pilot schools has already begun, and the UAE’s 2031 AI strategy has the kind of top-down institutional commitment that accelerates large programs. As this develops, there’s a sense that Abu Dhabi is conducting an experiment that the rest of the world will be observing for years—not just in terms of whether AI can enhance educational results, but also in terms of whether a government can truly restructure what a generation learns, at scale, on a deadline.










